Stephen Harper Let Me Count The Ways Why I Hate Thee

Stephen Harper Nobody Loves Me

  1. Proroguing Parliament four times, shutting it down for a total of 181 days
  2. Omnibus bills (10 of em)
  3. Robocalling during the 2011 election
  4. Fair Elections Act
  5. Gagging scientists from speaking freely about their research
  6. Auditing environmental and civil society groups
  7. Fear Tactics Anti-Terrorism Bill
  8. Withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol
  9. End of the Mandatory Long-Form Census
  10. Julie Couillard Affair: Former Defence Minister Maxine Bernier was forced to resign after leaving classified documents at the home of his girlfriend, who had ties to the Hell’s Angels
  11. Withholding Information from Parliament: withholding financial costs of specific non-classified programs to relevant Parliamentary committees and using funds not for stated purposes
  12. Milliken Contempt Rulings: Speaker of the House of Commons Peter Milliken finds government in contempt of Parliament on 2 counts
  13. Joint Strike Fighter: No bid contract
  14. Influence peddling: Bruce Carson former adviser of the PM accused of violating lobbying regulations for the personal benefit of his spouse.
  15. Afghan Detainee Affair: Accused of foot-dragging and withholding information on Canadian Forces complicity with the torture of detainees by Afghan Army/Security forces
  16. Suspending the ability of Federal civil servants to strike
  17. General anti-democratic behaviour: Limiting access of press to Prime Minister; Misusing RCMP; Screening attendees of political rallies
  18. Monitoring and Responding to Online Communications of Private Citizens: Tory government has embarked on a program to monitor and respond to online communications on internet bulletin boards, chatrooms and blog posts
  19. Defunding of organizations for ideological reasons: Defunding, or cutting funding to, organizations based not on performance, but ideology and religious belief.
  20. Canadian Senate expenses scandal: Senators Mike Duffy, Mac Harb, Pamela Wallin, and Patrick Brazeau claimed travel and housing expenses from the Senate for which they were not eligible
  21. vicious non-factual propaganda attacks on those who oppose Harper
  22. Stephen Harper rejects stimulus to help economy instead to increase corporate welfare
  23. The list goes on to infinitum.

Stephen Harper Mad with Power


CBC Bans David Coon and Kris Austin from engaging in French Debate

CBC-Judgement-Call

What is the method behind CBCs madness when they barred the leaders from the Green party and the People’s alliance, according to CBC radio the reasons that they denied the leaders from the green and the People’s alliance party was because CBC radio was of the opinion that neither of these two candidates French was good enough to have on air.

This is interesting because how do you actually judge one’s competence in a second language what are the benchmarks that they are using to determine what is competent and what isn’t. The problem seems to be that it appears that CBC radio has used two different types of criteria is to determine fluency in French. From a Francophone perspective David Alward is in affected ineffective when he is discoursing in French. David Alward when he is reading from a script creates the illusion that he is somewhat fluent French but when you listen to him read his French script it is obvious that he does not comprehend what he is reading. When Alward speaks French without a script his deficiency in the language stands out. In this respect Alward, when he is trying to express his thoughts in French he is no better than the leaders of the Green and People’s alliance party. It is always difficult to speak and express one’s thoughts accurately when one isn’t familiar with the language.

So the question is once again asked. Why is Alward allowed to participate in the French debate who skills are at par with the other two leaders that CBC has identified as not being fluent enough to be allowed to engage in the public debate on CBCs airwaves?

Had CBC tried to exclude Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois from the English debate in Québec because of her limited fluency in English. Had CBC radio Québec refused her participation in the English debates the people of Québec would have gone up in arms against CBC.

So why then is CBC radio giving Premier David Alward preferential treatment. If the leaders of the respective parties feel comfortable enough to debate the issues in their second language than they should be allowed to do so.

David Alward originally declined to attend any debates with anyone on the issues of very Harper like strategy, however recently Alward reversed his decision and is now going to partake in this September 9 debate however party president Jason Stephen did say that they did not agree in allowing the Green and the alliance parties joining in the debate.

There has to be more behind this story, which will not be revealed to the public until after the elections.